In depth review of the King’s Gambit by Smerdon
ChessVibes have an interesting review of The King’s Gambit by John Shaw.
In depth review of the King’s Gambit by Smerdon Read Post »
ChessVibes have an interesting review of The King’s Gambit by John Shaw.
In depth review of the King’s Gambit by Smerdon Read Post »
When I sat down to write the Attacking Manual 1 the main goal for me was to make the book very readable. It later made me very happy when Slovakian GM Jan Markos (author of the underrated and generally excellent Beat the KID) said that he had read the book like if it had been
Different approaches to the same material Read Post »
In comments to this blog, a review critical of “Playing the Trompowsky” was linked. IM Richard Pert asked for the right to respond. If “everyone is entitled to an opinion” then that must include the author, so I will let Richard take it from here: Firstly I want to say “thank you” to
“Playing the Trompowsky” – IM Richard Pert responds to a critical review Read Post »
Calculation won the ACP book of the year prize with one vote ahead of How I Beat Fischer’s Record. Sort of random and a bit undeserved, as Judit’s book is far richer than mine. But obviously people care most about improvement, so a training book always has an advantage. This is not said to be
Today in his always interesting column at ChessCafe, FM Carsten Hansen, gives what is probably my best ever review for Grandmaster Preparation – Calculation. It is not so much the six stars as well as some quotable sentences that make me so happy. But rather a few other facts: * Carsten is not generally a
My best ever review Read Post »
We have a policy of not publically disagreeing with reviews of our books. There are several reasons: 1) It almost always looks like sour grapes 2) We certainly don’t want to complain when the reviewers are too generous, so we feel it unsporting to do so when they are unfair in the other direction 3)
Review of Positional Play on ChessCafe Read Post »
One of my favourite sites on the net is www.chesscafe.com, where you can get interesting articles and reviews of a high quality. About a year ago they changed their review system from five to four stars, without making it obvious for people like myself who suffer from mouse-clicking-too-fast syndrom. A number of 4/4 reviews were
I used to review for SKAKBLADET, the Danish Federation’s magazine, but was axed because I became a publisher. I then continued reviewing for Chess Today, where I had the principle of not reviewing books I could not recommend, because I was a publisher. Still other publishers complained and I was axed 8-). I reviewed only
Disappointment takes adequate planning – an essay about reviewing Read Post »