Quality Chess Blog

Is there any plan of including this lines into the book and printing a new edition?

Thanks and congratos for the good work

Awesome work, thank you very much!

Hi there. Could you please tell me when Dr. Rios’s book ”Chess imbalances: A grandmaster guide” will be available? When I first clicked on “coming soon” icon, it initially said Provisional release date 2023 but now it says 2024. Any update?

All comments from readers and commentators should be evaluated and used in a new, enlarged edition.

Regarding updates

I think Playing 1 d4 could do with updating
Any plans?

HI HAVE nikos any new projects in mind….greetz

It would seem only fair if he wrote “Playing 1.c4 c5” for Black (to go on the shelf next to “Playing 1.d4 d5” and “Playing 1.e4 e5”).

Chapter 11 (Slav-Grunfeld) A34) 7…a5!? 8.Nc3 seems to be missing the Stockfish-approved 8…d4.

I like the idea of Nikos extending “Playing 1.d4 d5” and “Playing 1.e4 e5” further towards a complete repertoire for Black. “Playing 1.c4 c5” is one way to do it.

Another way is that he could cover how to, if reasonable, offer White the opportunity to transpose into one of the other books, and then cover what to do if White declines Black’s kind offer, and what to do if such transposition is not reasonable.

I’d buy it.

It’s not really needed. In “Playing 1.d4 d5” Nikos already gave a short rep against 1c4 with e6 and d5, he mentioned it in the English book.

Benjamin Fitch :
It would seem only fair if he wrote “Playing 1.c4 c5” for Black (to go on the shelf next to “Playing 1.d4 d5” and “Playing 1.e4 e5”).

It could be a great series.
Next volume “Playing 1.g4 g5”.

In the QID material, Nikos explains his thinking about recommending 7 h4!? in contrast to , say, 7 Re1 but he does not cover Black responding with 7..Ne4 which is his main answer to 7 Re1!

I recently had an online game against a 2450 rated player who did play Ne4 in response to h4. I cannot find a good response for White which yields anything much at all.

When Nikos discusses 7.Re1, his main line is 7…d5. 7…Ne4 is mentioned in a note.

You could investigate 8.Nfd2 and see if there’s a point where h2-h4 proves more useful than Re1. Alternatively, 8.Bf4 is approved by Stockfish, and it’s easy to imagine there will be some lines where the h4-pawn is useful in stabilizing the bishop on f4.

… I cannot find a good response for White which yields anything much at all.

This perfectly describes the situation before White’s first move. Which historical player (maybe Botvinnik?) said, “Wait for your opponent to get an idea; it’s sure to be wrong.” Obviously, this is slightly more likely to occur sometime after the opening phase.

@Benjamin Fitch I think that quote is generally attributed to Tarrasch.

Hi

Slightly off topic. I want to start to play proper ICCF correspondence tournaments. What is teh best way to use Correspondence databases and engines in such play? I can’t seem to find any decent resources on how to approach the exercise ie what openings to chose, how to study the positions and the databases etc.

Any pointers welcome.

@Chessdude
Generally, for ICCF, when I prepare against a specific opponent, these are the things I notice:

– Does he have a certain pet line, or he jumps around from opening to opening?
– In his pet lines, does he play one variation and with good results (so, better not go there), or he changes after each game (this becomes a candidate opening to play)?

After looking at this, for every player, then I am thinking for the tournament in general:

– How many point do I need? Do I want to win, or to get a norm? Or to qualify?
– If I need +1 or +2, then I focus on my White openings
– If I need +3 (or more) I also need to be more ambitious with Black

Then, I return to each opponent and I try to understand against who I may have more chances to push for anything, and against who I may need to kill the game as soon as possible and get a draw. Getting a couple of quick draws is important, as it may give me more time to focus on other games. But, “killing” the game and “drawing” the game is a different thing. I may simplify the game and be ready to make a draw, but I’ll keep it going a little longer. Quick draws give your opponent information and a specific opponent might abandon the tournament later and you may miss a good chance to score a win because you drew earlier than you should.

Also, be ready to get the things as you planned in less than 1/3 of the time. So, be ready to adapt as you go. Especially if your opponent plays a “dubious” opening, then put this game immediately to the candidates for you pushing for the win.

When for a certain game you have marked that you push for the win, do this. Generally search more and use more analysis engines (not only Stockfish). Analyze wider and deeper and try to set traps as much as you can. When you decide on a move, give yourself at least one extra day to analyze it further. Avoid exchanging pieces and avoid winning a pawn but giving your opponent the two bishops as compensation (the famous “Marshall drawing method” which is very effective in corr chess).

For your other games, be more efficient and use Stockfish only and there is no need to give extra analysis days.

If you realize that an opponent that you wanted to draw, is playing to win against you, possibly using the method I described above, it might be tough :), especially if they are a good player. Be patient, it happens.

The best way to win games today in corr is to be patient and accumulate small inaccuracies. When your opponent realize that they should have been more careful and they rushed a couple of decisions, they can go into a panic mode. They may try to force a simplification, which means more chances to play another inaccurate move. This is where your chance is. But, don’t get depressed if you fight well and still draw. For the games that you’ll get chances, only 1 our of 8 or 1 out of 10 you’ll manage to win. But, when you get chances DON’T RUSH! Play slowly, decide on your move but analyze for one more day etc, as I said above.

I hope these notes will help you!

Hi Nikos,

Fascinating stuff. Many thanks.

It has been fascinating reading also what little material there is on corr. I enjoyed Pusy’s book but also Baumbach’s on the Champion of Champions. Some extraordinary games.

But do you think that era is effectively of historic interest? I mean Umansky played the Pirc in this tournament with stunning results.

Do you think players can still play openings like that? (I love the Pirc!) which is a roundabout way of saying other than preparing specific openings, do you think normal OTB openings are all playable, or should it be Berlins, QGD, Nimzos, etc? Although v tempted to try your English repertoire

@Chessdude

Yeah, these days you can play almost anything in corr and get a draw with a bit of care. It’s sad…

“It’s sad” –

Happy new year, Nikos and keep up your excellent work.
On chesspub.com I had some time ago a small discussion about draw in cc with T. Bragesjö, he gave a line in KID as a perfect draw line:

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 O-O
6.Be2 e5 7.O-O exd4 8.Nxd4 Re8 9.f3 c6 10.Kh1 d5
11.cxd5 cxd5 12.Bg5 Nc6 13.Bb5 h6 14.Nxc6 bxc6 15.Bxc6 hxg5
16.Bxa8 d4 17.Ne2 d3 18.Ng3 Ba6 19.Bc6 Re6 20.Qa4 Qb6
21.Bd5 Nxd5 22.exd5 Re5 23.Rfe1 Rxd5 24.Qe8+ Bf8 25.Re7 Qf6
26.Qa8 Re5 27.Rxe5 Qxe5

My comment was:
My entire chess life – over 40 years – 7. …ed4 was possible, but White is slightly better, 10. … d5 dubious, due to 11. cd5 ed5 12. Bg5! and after 12. ….de4 13. Ndb5 was best and black is under pressiure and you give me this strange line, where White is better indeed, but engines can hold it.

I understand (nearly) nothing about chess, I’m just a (strong) amateur, who enjoys every book you write, an addicted customer, who still wants to improve, albeit in vain, but there’s nothing sad about it, it’s the joy of the game!
Sometimes a break from playing helps to come up with new ideas – good luck!

When remote lie detectors improve (they measure slight changes in eye behaviors), we’ll be able to simply take a lie detector test and assert that we didn’t use the help of an engine during the game when registering a win or a draw. Then correspondence chess will be super fun again!

Can’t we swear Omigod and fear damnation instead?

Hi Team

Do you plan to publish any opening books in 2024?

Yes.

Rather laconic answer.

@Andrew Greet
Other than the Nimzo-Indian book, do you plan on letting us know at some point what they are?
Usually you do a catalogue where you give out such information.

Personally hoping for new stuff, QC has not previously published such as Ruy Lopez (White), Kan and Classical Sicilians.

Thank you in advance 🙂

Certainly Doc.

Firstly the Nimzo repertoire will be split into two volumes. It’s a complete repertoire for Black after 1.d4 Nf6, and when we started editing and familiarizing ourselves with the work that had been delivered, it became clear that it was far too much for a single volume. I assume this won’t come as a huge surprise to anyone.

I can also reveal that we will be doing another opening book from Nikos. Full details to be revealed later.

There is at least one other opening book which is well over 50% written, but it’s a bit too early to give details.

I’m probably forgetting something else. But, anyway that gives you a bit more information for now, and we will make further announcements when we’re ready.

Hello everyone,
I have two questions:
1. where can I find the position after: 1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.g3 d5 5.d5 Nd5 6.Bg2 Nf6?
2. is it possible to start with 1.Nf3 and play the repertoire / where is this not possible?
best regards

@omax

1) It’s on the second page of Nikos’s update: https://www.qualitychess.co.uk/ebooks/PlayingtheEnglish-Appendix.pdf

2) 1.Nf3 d5 takes us out of the repertoire, as 2.c4 can be met by 2…d4 (as opposed to 2…c6 or 2…e6, which would transpose). However, it could be worth considering doing some work on 1.Nf3 and using it against some opponents.

After 1.Nf3 d5, you can play 2.h3 and then play the upcoming two-volume 1.d4 Nf6 repertoire from Quality Chess (with colors reversed). For example, if Black is someone who always plays the Trompovsky as White, they’ll be very frustrated after 2.h3.

Andrew Greet :
Certainly Doc.
Firstly the Nimzo repertoire will be split into two volumes. It’s a complete repertoire for Black after 1.d4 Nf6, and when we started editing and familiarizing ourselves with the work that had been delivered, it became clear that it was far too much for a single volume. I assume this won’t come as a huge surprise to anyone.
I can also reveal that we will be doing another opening book from Nikos. Full details to be revealed later.
There is at least one other opening book which is well over 50% written, but it’s a bit too early to give details.
I’m probably forgetting something else. But, anyway that gives you a bit more information for now, and we will make further announcements when we’re ready.

Am in thinking that the Nimzo repertoire after 3 Nf3 is based on 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 e6 3 Nf3 d5 4 Nc3 dxc4

Dear Andrew,
can you already disclose which route the Nimzo book will go after 3.Nf3? Will it go into QGD territory (possibly with a Ragozin in mind) or stay “independent” with a Bogo- or Queen’s Indian?
Thanks a lot!

@Griot
If you visit the Killer Chess Training site, the course by the author gives the Vienna for black. I would imagine this will be the recommendation in the book.

@Nikos Ntirlis
Its interesting response, however my experience with todays ICCF reality is different.
Just shortly:
– chess is draw
– Stockish knows how to play chess, even without books, databases. Its sad, but is reallity.
– “standard” openings is impossible lost. In example – Berlin, Meran, Botvinnik, (sicilian, but.., please no KID). In history there were blind spots (B97-poisoned pawn, D43-Anti-Moscow, London), but nearly all were solved.
– play slowly. Really slowly. Only the slowest players can win 🙂 (ask Nickel or Kribben).
– its very high probability, that you win game without merit – your opponent overstep time (without any sensible reason – Duda), being ill (Baumbach) or die (Dronov) – looks depressing and sad, but last thing happened few weeks ago in World Championship 33 Final and nullified chances for title for some players. Very often your opponent make typo – and you win again (in one national tournament in 2022/22023 with average ELO around 2300 was quite high number decided games – and 20% were decided by typo).
– of course – still – own work, experience, HW&SW make your chance for winning game higher.

@ Alice B

Can I ask what you mean by “standard” openings is impossible lost? And are the openings you list do you think unplayable on ICCF?

And slow play, I assume you mean take your time and analyse a lot?

@Chessdude
Some of them are mentioned in previous post. The simplest way is to check games top corr. players (ICCF game archive is avaliable for all registered people).

Some way problematic are positions with structural defect or some strategical risk (ie. KID, Chigorin Ruy Lopez, Benko gambit, Benoni, Dutch…).