Home > Authors in Action > Beware – Tiger!

Beware – Tiger!

Having had fun debating the Swiss system, let’s move on to something less contentious.

What is the strongest way forward here?

White to play!

I am going through a lot of games from the Olympiad at the moment and this one really caught my eye. See how author of The Modern Tiger improved his positions here.

And yes, I am going to continue to have opinions even if people buy our books…

Categories: Authors in Action Tags:
  1. Thomas
    October 23rd, 2018 at 14:55 | #1

    1. Kh6 Qxf2 2. Qxf8+ looks nice…

  2. Jacob Aagaard
    October 23rd, 2018 at 14:57 | #2

    @Thomas
    Does the board not come out right in your end?

  3. Bulkington
    October 23rd, 2018 at 15:17 | #3

    Short – Timmann.
    But what happended with the Swiss-system blog… ?

  4. Thomas
    October 23rd, 2018 at 15:46 | #4

    Ok, with FIDE inventing new rules every year I fear 1.Kh6 might be illegal these days.

  5. RYV
    October 23rd, 2018 at 16:02 | #5

    Bulkington :
    Short – Timmann.
    But what happended with the Swiss-system blog… ?

    maybe Freedom of speech and BigBrother ….

    anyway jacob vs rest of the world isnt a very interresting debate. but how to improve on the swiss system is a good post. It has implication on weekend tournament as on the olympiads.

  6. Brandon Vila
    October 23rd, 2018 at 16:15 | #6

    After about a minute of thinking, I was considering Kf4, having thoughts, and possibly deja vu of Short vs. Timman. I was absolutely shocked that I was correct…

  7. Rabindra Paul
    October 23rd, 2018 at 16:28 | #7

    I too was at the Dundee Congress over the weekend and I have thoroughly enjoyed the Swiss system debate, including Andrew’s spirited and good-natured riposte, before the blog was pulled…..
    My theory, Jacob, is that after recently drawing with a few 2200 players at the Xtracon Open (formerly Politiken Cup), you decided to take great risks in all your games with the significantly lower-rated players.
    Best wishes to the QC Team

  8. Jacob Aagaard
    October 23rd, 2018 at 16:36 | #8

    @Bulkington
    I think everyone had their fun 🙂

  9. Jacob Aagaard
    October 23rd, 2018 at 16:38 | #9

    @Rabindra Paul
    I think there is no doubt that Andrew is a stronger player than I these days. Those draws were sometimes very much appreciated. This is an entirely different thing than which tournament system is fair. But hurling insults gets lame quite quickly :-), which is not what I was looking for.

  10. Jacob Aagaard
    October 23rd, 2018 at 16:39 | #10

    @RYV
    My view is simple: use the same system for standings, pairing and prizes. The current one penalises those who are good at chess and have higher ratings. I cannot see the point of that.

  11. An Ordinary Chessplayer
    October 24th, 2018 at 20:44 | #11

    Hmm, I was also wondering about the Swiss system question. I made the first comment there but did not check back (soon enough) to see how it went after that. My apologies if my comment contributed to the thread being deleted. I know that not everybody “likes” my tone when I comment on the internet…

  12. Jacob Aagaard
    October 25th, 2018 at 06:52 | #12

    @An Ordinary Chessplayer
    Not you, no worries.

  13. Hard Truther
    October 26th, 2018 at 04:11 | #13

    @An Ordinary Chessplayer: There really was not much left to say after your sagacious post on the subject mater.

    It’s a shame the thread could not just be locked rather than toss it down the memory hole.

  14. JB
    October 26th, 2018 at 06:31 | #14

    Jacob deleting the thread was a much better move but you’re still not letting it go. You can’t move on from this week’s meltdown to a new topic if you keep bringing it up yourself and picking off the scab. You are a great chess trainer but at the risk of being insulted diplomacy isn’t your strong suit so maybe stick to commenting on non contraversial chess topics and let John and Andrew deal with those topics on the blog .

  15. Jacob Aagaard
    October 26th, 2018 at 11:09 | #15

    @JB
    I mostly do not care what people think about me. Because as we saw in that debate, there are a lot of people who feel they are entitled to lecture others to great length, building a shaky moral platform of insults and lack of objective arguments.

    I think that the Swiss system used in a way where the tiebreak and the pairing are not following the same system is unfair. In the past I reacted to this by stopping playing tournaments where I am the number one seed.

    I deleted the post because it was distracting from work, not because I regretted telling people that feel the right to judge me without addressing the argument made what I thought of that approach.

  16. Ray
    October 26th, 2018 at 11:17 | #16

    @Jacob Aagaard
    Amen 🙂

  17. Jacob Aagaard
    October 26th, 2018 at 11:39 | #17

    I should probably clarify that I would be very grateful being “lectured” about being wrong on the topic in hand 🙂

  18. TonyRo
    October 26th, 2018 at 14:27 | #18

    I saw this game while perusing the Batumi games and covered it on my YouTube channel. Reminded me a bit of Short-Timman from Tilburg way back when. I called the video something like “Tiger Mauls Opponent in ‘Short’ Fashion”, and couldn’t have been more pleased at my totally lame pun. 😀 Very cool game by a seemingly very cool dude!

  19. Jacob Aagaard
    October 26th, 2018 at 15:08 | #19

    @TonyRo
    Tiger is a wonderful human being

  20. Leon Trotsky
    October 30th, 2018 at 04:02 | #20

    Surely 1. Rf4 Dxf2+ 2. Rg5 Df5+ 3. Rh6 ¿

    Even if it does not work, sheer practical value of shock would probably make opponent collapse and get mated soon anyway 😀

  21. Jake
    November 11th, 2018 at 04:34 | #21

    Couldn’t find your email, but in “Grandmaster Preparation – Calculation” exercise 20 is not a draw, it is completely winning for black. After Rh8 Qe1 d2 (or Rc7, but not Rbb8?) Qq1 Rc7 its lights out for white.

  22. Jarogniew Walczak
    November 11th, 2018 at 08:20 | #22

    I am reading through the Modern Tiger book and hope that playing a non theoretical opening will allow me to concentrate on my calculation and endgames

  23. Jacob Aagaard
    November 12th, 2018 at 15:47 | #23

    @Jake
    But Qg1 is a mistake. White is much better after Qd1 (with the idea Qxd2) instead. But thank you anyway; we always look for improvements to the books!

  24. Jacob Aagaard
    November 12th, 2018 at 16:02 | #24

    I should probably add that after letting the computer run for half an hour and checking what it came up with, Black seems to hold with a tempo.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

 Limit your comments to